"Thou Shalt Not Fetch Across Commits" was ingrained in me many, many moons ago.  It is 
poor practice
and can cause multitudes of problems.

Just my 2 cents.  YMMV.

Ron Thomas
Hypercom, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Each new user of a new system uncovers a new class of bugs. -- Kernighan


                                                                                       
                                                           
                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                                
                                                           
                      .com                     To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]             
                                                        
                      Sent by:                 cc:                                     
                                                           
                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]        Subject:  RE: COMMIT's within cursor 
for loops                                                     
                      .com                                                             
                                                           
                                                                                       
                                                           
                                                                                       
                                                           
                      06/26/2003 01:49                                                 
                                                           
                      PM                                                               
                                                           
                      Please respond to                                                
                                                           
                      ORACLE-L                                                         
                                                           
                                                                                       
                                                           
                                                                                       
                                                           




>I prefer to create an inner block using BEGIN and END inside the loop. This
>isolates the DML statements. The COMMIT is issued inside the BEGIN and END
>block.
>
>RWB

That allows you to avoid invalidating the cursor established "for update"?
I dont' see how the two are related.  You just created an exception block
within the cursor loop.  Or am i misunderstanding what you are saying here?

Regarding the original question commiting within a cursor for loop.  It is
allowable if you do not create the cursor "for update".  If you created the
cursor using "for update", you will not only NOT retain a lock on the record
set, you will get an error indicating an invalid cursor.

Steve McClure

-----Original Message-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



I prefer to create an inner block using BEGIN and END inside the loop. This
isolates the DML statements. The COMMIT is issued inside the BEGIN and END
block.

RWB

============================================================================
================================

Reginald W. Bailey
IBM Global Services - ETS SW GDSD - Database Management
Your Friendly Neighborhood DBA
713-216-7703 (Office) 281-798-5474 (Mobile) 713-415-5410 (Pager)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============================================================================
================================



                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    ic.com               To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    Sent by:             cc:
                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]       Subject:     COMMIT's within cursor
for loops
                    ity.com


                    06/25/2003
                    12:40 PM
                    Please respond
                    to ORACLE-L







Hi All,

Can somebody please clear up some issues about issuing commits during
CURSOR
FOR LOOPS

I have done some research within Metalink and the ORACLE-L FAQ but am still
a tad bit confused.

Are the following statements regarding cursors TRUE

1. If you issue a commit within a for cursor loop you release all locks
regardless of whether you're cursor statement has a FOR UPDATE statement in
it or there is a WHERE CURRENT statement within the loop.

2. If you are using OPEN CURSOR...FETCH INTO statements to get the data the
same rule applies.

Thanks,

N.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Nuala Cullen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author:
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Steve McClure
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Ron Thomas
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to