Title: Message

Unfortunately, that’s what we have!!!!! And yes, my resume is on-line!!!! Our database configuration and installation was outsourced and so was the installation of our ERP. So guess what happened? No consultation with the “support analyst” and now they want to split the schemas into multiple instances. Go figure J

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mladen Gogala
Sent: September 19, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Reducing the number of databases

 

Additional money might be saved by having only one database which would assume the role of QA, development and

production. That would mean that developers test in production and their own QA. You can save a bundle on oracle

licenses that way. In addition to that, if you switch to noarchivelog mode, you can save a small fortune on the backup

tapes. Smart thing to do in that situation would be to put your resume online before stuff hits the fan.

 

 

--
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guang Mei
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Reducing the number of databases

Here we have 3 environments for most applications (dev, QA and prod) and all Oracle version are the same (8173 now). It works fine. And to save Oracle license costs, we also consolidated some db servers by putting multiple instances on one server machine. No problem so far.

 

Guang

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of AK
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Reducing the number of databases

I have seen more requirement for individual development databases ( where ind schema is not possible ) due to complexity of application . Developers step on each other if they work of same database . A pl/sql developer is invalidating procedure while a java developer is trying to make his program work.

 

-ak

 

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:59 AM

Subject: Reducing the number of databases

 

Hi,

 

We have around 120 databases. Most applications have 5 environments (dev, test, integrated test, acceptance, prod) some applications have more. The applications are a mix of home developped and bought application (peoplesoft, harvest, compass,...)

New applications are coming in.

New databases will appear soon with DB2UDB.

 

All servers are unix/aix, there are 15 production server and around 10 servers for the dev, test, integrated test and  acceptance databases.

All databases are at 8172 except 6-7 databases and planning to go to 9i in 2004. Off course we see the migration like a pain.

 

We want to reduce the number of databases and instances.

To obtain a significative gain I think we must reduced to around 60 databases.

 

Anybody has done the task to consolidate on less servers and les databases ?

 

One way to do it would be to go with

    2 instances of dev

    2 instances of test

    2 instances of integrated test

    2 instances of acceptance

    all prod instances are standalone.

 

Food for thought

    backup

    Oracle version

    availability

    naming convention of objects

    security

    ...

 

All feedback is welcome.

 

Stephane Paquette

Administrateur de bases de donnees

Database Administrator

Standard Life

www.standardlife.ca

Tel. (514) 499-7999 poste 7470 et (514) 925-7187

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

Note:

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Wang Trading LLC and any of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity.

 

 

Reply via email to