Tuesday, January 20, 2004, 9:19:44 AM, Goulet, Dick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: GD> Well, PostGreSql has all of those features, but handling 100GB? Not sure & not sure I'd trust GD> it that far.
You know, I talked to someone at last year's MySQL conference who was using MySQL to manage three terabytes. I don't recall the details of what he was doing, how many users, how much I/O, etc. I recall though, that it was a mostly read-only database. However, I don't think size alone is a very meaningful statistic. Best regards, Jonathan Gennick --- Brighten the corner where you are http://Gennick.com * 906.387.1698 * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Join the Oracle-article list and receive one article on Oracle technologies per month by email. To join, visit http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/oracle-article, or send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include the word "subscribe" in either the subject or body. -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Jonathan Gennick INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
