Hi David,

I have two tables that have maintain by two groups and recently found
out that they overlap to some extend. The column-A that I represented
was a user name column. I cant say exactly what the column-B and
column-D are due to information policy :( but lets say its a contact
info or some number. But I how could we accomplish without a union..?

Thanks alot.
Anu

On Oct 14, 8:46 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 13, 11:35 pm, JNewMember <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I want to do a merge over  a common column, lets say i have two tables
> > that reflect fallowing structure.
>
> > Table 1                                                         Table
> > 2
> > Column-A                    Column-B                   Column-
> > A                            Column-D
> > ---------------                   ---------------
> > -----------------                         ----------------
> > 0001                              233
> > 0003                                    67000
> > 0003*                             3000
> > 0006                                       5500
> > 0002                              80
> > 0001                                     45000
> > 0003 (not mistake)           5000
>
> > So Column-A can have same value twice (not Unique - I know bad design-
> > This is more of data extraction). Also table 2 has the same Column-A.
>
> > I was thinking to do a union such as
> > Select Column-A, Column-B from Table1 union select Column-A, Column-D
> > from table2
>
> > is this the bast way to do..?
>
> > Thanks,
>
> What, exactly, do you want as your end result?  A UNION will do just
> that, UNION the results, preserving unique rows:
>
> SQL> create table table_1
>   2  ( column_A varchar2(6)
>   3    column_B number);
>
> Table created.
>
> SQL>
> SQL> create table table_2
>   2  ( column_A varchar2(6)
>   3    column_D number);
>
> Table created.
>
> SQL>
> SQL> insert all
>   2  into table_1
>   3  values('0001', 233)
>   4  into table_1
>   5  values('0003', 3000)
>   6  into table_1
>   7  values('0002', 80)
>   8  into table_1
>   9  values('0003', 5000)
>  10  into table_2
>  11  values('0003', 67000)
>  12  into table_2
>  13  values('0006', 5500)
>  14  into table_2
>  15  values('0001', 45000)
>  16  select * From dual;
>
> 7 rows created.
>
> SQL>
> SQL> commit;
>
> Commit complete.
>
> SQL>
> SQL> select
>   2          column_a,
>   3          column_b
>   4  from
>   5          table_1
>   6  union
>   7  select
>   8          column_a,
>   9          column_d
>  10  from table_2;
>
> COLUMN   COLUMN_B
> ------ ----------
> 0001          233
> 0001        45000
> 0002           80
> 0003         3000
> 0003         5000
> 0003        67000
> 0006         5500
>
> 7 rows selected.
>
> SQL>
>
> Is this how you want these results to appear?  Are you certain that
> associating a given 'key' value with multiple results is the desired
> output?  What, exactly, do these tables contain?  Why is this
> 'process' necessary?  You have much to explain before any usable
> answer can be given.
>
> David Fitzjarrell
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Oracle PL/SQL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Oracle-PLSQL?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to