On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 13:54 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > On Qua, 2007-07-25 at 14:38 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > > Hi Gustavo and Michael, > > > > I've convinced myself that I should commit as trunk+patch is much better > > than what is in trunk right now. > > > > [Gustavo] I would like to suggest a new release (2.14.9?) if your test > > boxes are happy with revision 2011. > > I was just testing this. Before your today's commits, the test still > fails: > > Running timeout server... > Running timeout client... > ======================================================================= > *** Starting GIOP timeout tests *** > ======================================================================= > Provoking timeout exception... Timeout_ping(): > IDL:omg.org/CORBA/COMM_FAILURE:1.0 > Shutting down GIOP timeout tests... CORBA_Object_release(): > IDL:omg.org/CORBA/COMM_FAILURE:1.0 > ======================================================================= > *** Some GIOP timeout tests failed *** > ======================================================================= > FAIL: timeout.sh > > > After your commits it works OK: > > Running timeout server... > Running timeout client... > ======================================================================= > *** Starting GIOP timeout tests *** > ======================================================================= > Provoking timeout exception... OK > Testing reacquired connection with no server delay... OK > Testing with small server delay... OK > Provoking timeout exception... OK > Testing reacquired connection with no server delay... OK > Shutting down GIOP timeout tests... OK > ======================================================================= > *** All GIOP timeout tests successful *** > ======================================================================= > PASS: timeout.sh > > > Whatever you did, goo work. I'm pretty happy with it now :)
Thanks a lot. I'm happy that it works ;-) > Although > it would be better to get rid of the "Starting GIOP timeout test" > messages; no reason why these particular unit tests need more prominence > than any other unit tests :) Yes, no more need to make this particular test case stand out. Fix committed (rev 2012). > I'll make a release as soon as I get a free slot of hacking time; maybe > tonight. Great, thanks a lot! Best regards, jules _______________________________________________ orbit-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-list
