On 09/05/2008, at 16.37, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 11:27 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: >>> - Make sure giop_thread_free() is not called on threads associated >>> with connections for which timeouts are outstanding. Is this >>> feasible? >>> It sounds kinda like a clean and obvious solution, but I don't >>> really >>> understand the code that well... >>> >>> Jules, do you have any ideas? Have you ever seen this happen? >> >> I've never seen this happen before. I would agree that your proposal >> number 3 is the way to go, but I can not clearly see how to implement >> it. Michael? > > Really, it's not that clear to me how we are doing a thread_free and > the continuing to wait for a timeout in that thread ;-) > > Are we correctly de-registering the timeout after we finish waiting ?
I certainly think we are. I may have made an error but I was careful to ref/unref whenever appropriate. BR, jules > > or does the timeout get triggered in the IO thread or something ? :-) > > Regards, > > Michael. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot > > _______________________________________________ orbit-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-list
