Thanks, Nina, for bringing up that important topic again. As you no doubt remember, the AOS (the library committee, which I chaired) developed a rather extensive plan for digitizing the world's orchid literature. I still believe it was and is a good plan. However, the "powers that be" decided to take the library project in a different direction (as far as I know, just getting the AOS print library organized and in place). Sad. One of the positive outcomes that I believe the digital project would have is assisting judges with a more complete resource (and one that included excellent metadata--essentially digital indexing--so that relevant information could be easily found). The plan included not only out-of-copyright materials, but also out-of-print but still copyrighted materials. I won't reiterate all of that here. As far as I know the plan is still available on my personal website. And the initial books that were digitized are still available in the digital library web pages (and the catalog) of Michigan State University, a former partner in the project (I say former because the AOS refused to honor their signed contract for payment for services rendered).

One significant event has occured in the digital library world since that time that bears notice, and that is the announcement by Google that they plan to digitize the entire "out of copyright" collections of some major libraries (my recollection is that they were Oxford, Harvard, Stanford, Berkeley and one other--New York Public, perhaps?). I never heard if this was only books or included serials. I'm sure there are significant orchid resources in at least some of these libraries (after all, the AOS used to be at Harvard), particularly in the botanical area. None of these libraries that I know if has a particular horticulture emphasis or necessarily specializes in botany, for that matter. Given that, and the fact that all of them are in English-speaking countries (and only one in Europe, if one considers the UK to be Europe!), I strongly suspect that some very valuable orchid resources would be missed in such a project.

I'd call it a very good first step. A serious digital orchid library project would see if that project could be expanded (or a complementary project begun) to ensure that a comprehensive digital orchid library was developed. And of course, there would remain the issues around materials that are not yet in the public domain (and there might well be some soluttions to those, particularly those that are out of print).

Sincerely,
Harvey
In sunny Seattle!





_______________________________________________ the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) orchids@orchidguide.com http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

Reply via email to