They finally responded on Twitter to clarify things: https://twitter.com/riseupnet/status/801902121150869504
https://twitter.com/riseupnet/status/801902265170673664 On 24/11/16 15:11, Alexandros Papadopoulos wrote: > "Riseup intends to update this report approximately once per quarter" > > So they may be a few days late, but the "approximately" allows for that. They > seem to be around on Twitter. I don't think the sky has fallen just yet. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > From: Philip Hudson <[email protected]> > Sent: 24 November 2016 13:54:08 GMT+00:00 > To: Y Martin <[email protected]>, Bristol and Bath Linux User Group > <[email protected]> > Cc: Open Rights Group open discussion list > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ORG-discuss] [bristol] likely RiseUp.net server gag order > > On 24 November 2016 at 11:50, Y Martin via Bristol > <[email protected]> wrote: >> To those of you that use RiseUp services (eg. me), I just wanted to let >> you know that it is looking very likely that the riseup servers have >> been issued a gag order and should be considered compromised. >> >> The Riseup Canary has died/expired/not been renewed: >> https://riseup.net/en/canary and there is other suspicious activity/lack >> of activity which is being widely discussed on the internet without >> Riseup making any response to such discussions. > Damn. Why do I only hear about things like RiseUp when it's too late? > That looks like it was excellent. Thanks anyway Yousef. > > Copying this to the Open Rights Group. > -- Please support ORG's work - join and help fund our future: https://www.openrightsgroup.org/join To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [email protected] or use https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/org-discuss
