If you have chance to test it using such large memory I will be really appreciate if you publish results. But I am absolutely sure that we do not have any GC pauses because (sorry that repeat this) we do not use Java heap.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Andrey Lomakin <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > We did not test with such large memory but we use direct memory for data > caching, not java heap. > So GC does not provide any overhead because it does not exist in our data > caching solution (I mean low level cache system which is used bellow of our > index and cluster data structures). > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, cp2 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Has OrientDB been tested with very large amounts of RAM and very large >> graphs? >> By large, I mean 1/2 TB to 1TB range. >> If so, how is performance? >> How is Garbage Collector overhead? >> Ref: http://maxdemarzi.com/2013/11/25/scaling-up/ >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OrientDB" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrey Lomakin. > > Orient Technologies > the Company behind OrientDB > > -- Best regards, Andrey Lomakin. Orient Technologies the Company behind OrientDB -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
