At once we fix https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/2901 
and https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/2900 and can use 
document db instance as jdbc connection and this problem will gone.

What does this mean?

On Monday, October 20, 2014 4:41:19 AM UTC-4, Andrey Lomakin wrote:
>
> Hi,
> It is very cheap.
>
> At once we fix https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/2901 
> and https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/2900 and can use 
> document db instance as jdbc connection and this problem will gone. 
>
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:07 AM, odbuser <odbu...@gmail.com <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>> I worked around this by clearing the local cache before each use on the 
>> thread.  If building the local cache is expensive, I don't like the 
>> workaround since the majority of times, I do not want the local cache 
>> enabled.
>>
>> orientGraph.getRawGraph().getLocalCache().invalidate();
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, October 17, 2014 11:27:13 AM UTC-4, odbuser wrote:
>>>
>>> I spoke too soon.  I am getting the OConcurrentModificationException.  
>>> I have one thread that does some work and updates a record followed by 
>>> another thread that gets the record and updates it.  The second thread 
>>> fails with OConcurrentModificationException b/c it's getting the record 
>>> from the cache and it doesn't match the one in the database.
>>>
>>> How would I deal with this situation?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, October 16, 2014 8:22:16 PM UTC-4, odbuser wrote:
>>>>
>>>> By CME I assume you mean ConcurrentModificationException.  I am not 
>>>> sure what you mean by single thread mode.  I am using orientdb with 
>>>> multiple threads.  I don't remember the impact of having the cache on but 
>>>> so far have not encountered any issues.  I was just wondering why the 
>>>> option was removed as it wasn't explained in the issue.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, October 16, 2014 10:19:25 AM UTC-4, Andrey Lomakin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> No you always should use local cache but level2 cache was removed, if 
>>>>> you do not use local cache you will get CME on single thread mode.
>>>>> But you probably have objections.
>>>>> Could you list them ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:03 PM, odbuser <odbu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OGlobalConfiguration.CACHE_LOCAL_ENABLED (cache.local.enabled) was 
>>>>>> removed in 2.0-SNAPSHOT since 2.0-M2.  Is there a replacement?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to orient-databa...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Andrey Lomakin.
>>>>>
>>>>> Orient Technologies
>>>>> the Company behind OrientDB
>>>>>
>>>>>   -- 
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "OrientDB" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to orient-databa...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Andrey Lomakin.
>
> Orient Technologies
> the Company behind OrientDB
>
>  

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to orient-database+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to