>From my point of view, I think the lucene results are correct regarding the StandardAnalyser <http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_7_0/analyzers-common/org/apache/lucene/analysis/standard/StandardAnalyzer.html> used by default as stated in documentation <http://www.orientechnologies.com/docs/last/orientdb-lucene.wiki/Full-Text-Index.html>. As far as I can see the location field would be tokenized and therefor results should be slightly different.
One way to implement the like feature through lucene would be to use the supplied KeywordAnalyzer <http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_7_0/analyzers-common/org/apache/lucene/analysis/core/KeywordAnalyzer.html> in the metadata when creating the index. See metadata. Le mardi 20 janvier 2015 09:11:59 UTC+1, Erik Peterson a écrit : > > Using 2.0-RC1 > After some experimenting with queries using like, containstext, and > lucene, I have a search where "select from X where like 'abc%" provides the > best results. However it's slow and like can't use indexes correct? Is > there another way to emmulate "like" with lucene indexes? (Note that "select > from X where lucene 'abc*" provides very different search behavior from the > simiar "like" query.) Thanks. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
