Ok. Nevermind on this. I've found my own answer and the way I see it, there 
would be millions of ids under the "_allow" property. So, I understand now 
that the user security is only for database user security and cannot be 
used for application user security. This is good to know. I was going to 
use the ORestricted system for database user security for a multi-tenancy 
approach, which it will cover well, I suppose. At the same time, I was 
wondering if the user security could be also dropped down a level and also 
be used for application data security. This is not possible.

If I am wrong, please let me know, but I just can't imagine millions of 
user ids being easily scanned to allow for access to each and every record. 

Scott 

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to