Hi, Currently the is no namespace concept in OrientDB, so I'm afraid you have to use a custom naming convention for it, eg. namepsace_ClassName
There is an old issue about this https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/3854 but it's not in the roadmap for now. If it's a compelling need for you, please comment directly on the issue, maybe we can take it into consideration in the near future. Thanks Luigi 2016-10-19 3:58 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>: > > Hello document db gurus, > > I'm building a rather large orientdb database, which will contain classes > many of which need to be grouped logically by names. I understand that > class naming is advised to go by the Java conventions, which is great for a > limited number of classes. However, java also has the concept of packages > to allow developers create modules and group related classes. Relational > DBs typically have schemas, which can also be used to nicely and logically > group related tables, etc. > > What is the best way to group related classes in the OrientDB? I did > search the Internet, but didn't find any advised way to grouping or > practical use of class name-spacing. As an example, consider the following > groups of classes: Setting related classes, user related classes, industry > verticals, vertical lead types, etc. > > Please advise. Thanks, > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OrientDB" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
