> From: Robert Krüger [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> "Kucera, Rich" wrote:
>
> > Isn't container-managed transactions the point of EJBs anyway? So
> database
> > transaction
> > facilities are no longer mission critical? Or am I missing something...
> >
>
> you are. there's no point in container-managing transactions if your
> datasources are non-transactional. there's simply nothing to manage ;-).
>
> regards,
>
> robert
>
Ok, but the container implements the 2-phase logic, right?
Where's the beef in EJB anyway? I thought we had a transactional layer in
middleware with ejb...
datasources wouldn't necessarily need to be transactional themselves (they
wouldn't need to be
full-blown databases).
