Thanks for the definitive response. I guess we can use
database views to separate the dependent data from the
ejb data.
-tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Shellman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 12:00 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Re: ejb2 1:1 mapping to different table?
>
>
> We just had this exact same thing come up. I talked to an
> Orion person and
> he said that that is not supported right now. Sorry. He
> wasn't sure when it
> would be implemented--saying it was on the priority list but
> not at the top.
>
> Joel Shellman
> Chief Software Architect
> http://www.ants.com/90589781
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Drury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 7:57 AM
> Subject: ejb2 1:1 mapping to different table?
>
>
> >
> > I've done a 1:1 mapping in Orion using ejb 2.0. The
> > dependent object gets mapped into the same table as
> > the ejb. Can I move the dependent object out of the
> > table and into its own table (for clarity, reporting,
> > etc.)? Can orion-ejb-jar.xml do that? If so, does
> > anyone have an example that I can cheat from? The
> > only issue I see is needing a key/foreign key pair
> > which is not needed when they share a table.
> >
> > -tim
> >
> >
>
>
