Thanks,
I solved the problem, and that was the answer...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Schnitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:07 AM
Subject: RE: Concurrent modification


> ConcurrentModificationException is the result of a fail-fast iterator in
> the JDK 1.2+ collections framework.  If one thread is iterating a
> collection and another thread modifies the collection, the next call to
> the iterator will immediately throw this exception.  In the ugly old
> days of Hashtable and Vector, the results of concurrent modification
> were undefined.
>  
> You need to rethink your synchronization strategy for whatever shared
> data you are initializing in initsequence.jsp.
>  
> Jeff
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ing. Nicola Folino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 12:36 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Concurrent modification
> 
> 
> I have a web application with some jsp pages. If I click twice on a link
> to another jsp page, I get the exception:
>  
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
>         at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.next(Unknown Source)
>         at java.util.Collections$6.nextElement(Unknown Source)
>         at
> __jspPage21_initsequence_jsp._jspService(__jspPage21_initsequence_jsp
> .java:38)
>         at com.orionserver.http.OrionHttpJspPage.service(JAX)
>         at com.evermind.server.http.HttpApplication.xj(JAX)
>         at com.evermind.server.http.JSPServlet.service(JAX)
>         at com.evermind.server.http.d3.sw(JAX)
>         at com.evermind.server.http.d3.su(JAX)
>         at com.evermind.server.http.ef.s1(JAX)
>         at com.evermind.server.http.ef.do(JAX)
>         at com.evermind.util.f.run(JAX)
> Keep in mind that go to the other link through an intermediate page
> which uses the directive <jsp:forward page="somePage">. The same
> application runs perfectly on JRun, but I saw that Allaire J2EE Server
> moves from standard, so I'd like to develope on Orion...
> Thanks
> 


Reply via email to