Using a filter sounds like a good idea. It is a natural way to implement
Decorator design pattern.
--
Joni
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Smith Jason wrote:
>
> Maybe you could use a filter?
>
> Check out the filter tutorial at http://www.orionserver.com/
>
> /Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 9:17 PM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Cc: Dan Tharp
> Subject: Standar Template
>
> I want to create a web app in which every page on the site has a standard
> header along the top and a standard menu along the left edge (a pretty
> standard thing).
>
> I came up with 2 ways of doing this:
>
> 1. Use a table tag and jsp:include tags on EVERY page:
>
> <table>
> <tr>
> <td><jsp:include page="standardHeader.jsp"/></td>
> </tr>
> <tr>
> <td colspan="2">
> <table>
> <tr>
> <td valign="top"><jsp:include page="/menu.jsp" /></td>
> <td valign="top">
> THIS IS WHERE THE PAGE-SPECIFIC CONTENT (i.e. the body)*
> </td>
> </tr>
> </table>
> </td>
> </tr>
> </table>
>
> 2. Invert the above solution to create one master template (or controller)
> and have the content page name passed in as a parameter. Here would be the
> master template-controller page:
>
> <table>
> <tr>
> <td><jsp:include page="standardHeader.jsp"/></td>
> </tr>
> <tr>
> <td colspan="2">
> <table>
> <tr>
> <td valign="top"><jsp:include page="/menu.jsp" /></td>
> <td valign="top">
> <jsp:include page="<%=request.getParameter("contentPage")%>" />*
> </td>
> </tr>
> </table>
> </td>
> </tr>
> </table>
>
> The key difference between these two architectures are best understood by
> looking at the 2 lines with the * at the end. Also, in option 2, there is
> only one copy of the above code. In option 1, there is one copy "per content
> page"
>
> Q1: Does anyone have any preference between options 1 and 2?
> Q2: Is there a better way of achieving this result?
> Q3: Do either have any negetive drawback I need to consider? (I will be
> converting an entire site)
>
> By the way, I'm currently achieving this effect VERY easily using good old
> client-side html frames. But due to popular demand, framse must go.
>
> Dave Ford
> Smart Soft - The Java Training Company
> http://www.smart-soft.com
