inline

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Martes, 28 de Agosto de 2001 18:04
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: UserManager / BASIC auth; orion caching 
> username/password ????
> 
> 
> I've got a confusing issue that I'm observing:
> 
> I'm using BASIC authorization and installed my subclass of 
> AbstractUserManger into
> orion-application.xml.
> 
> I get the HTTP challeng login dialogue the first time, and 
> get into the protected site
> when my um.checkPassword ( user, pw ) returns true.
> 
> Problems are:
> 
> - After 3 failures I get sent to the 401 screen.   I'd like 
> to loop forever in the
>  login dialog.

non standard, check HTTP RFC
> 
>   ???
> 
> - The Security context seems to be cached and survives 
> re-starts of orion  ??????

The browser does that; once a basic auth works, the same browser process
will keep
sending the same auth to the server for each auth challenge.

> 
>   I see the um.checkPassword () method being called with the 
> successful username
>   password in my log4j logs.  Is the container supplying the 
> user/passwd without challenging
>   client????   This works for both IE and NS and I've turned 
> the auto-loggin features off for
>   IE.
> 
>    On one hand this is great for resilience, especially if 
> the session object is serialized too.
>    I haven't found any files that might be performing this 
> feature though???
> 
>    On the down side, I can't force a session / Security 
> Context invalidation to force a new
>    login for debugging purposes.   Stopping IE / NS and 
> restarting the client even jumps
>    back into the session without a HTTP challeng ???   I've 
> never seen this before?
> 
>     Why can't I find how to flush cookies in IE and NS...  ;< 
>  but this appears to be solely
>     an orion behavior and not using cookies to persist the 
> Security context???
> 
> 
> Anybody have an explanation of what's going on with this appearance of
> auto-login behavior via my UserManager.checkPassword() method?
> 
> very confused,
> 
> curt
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to