It's still officially in PFD status but will be approved with the release of J2EE 1.3 
coming out,
as I understand it. I believe BEA rolled it out with WebLogic 6.1. Pramati has it too. 
Others will
roll it out in the upcoming months - I assume Orion will be one of them. 
--- "GUNDA, Satish / RSAIFS - IOM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has it been declared approved formally? Or does the ballots suggest that it
> is going to be approved?
>  
> Has any of the app server vendors come out with plans in rolling out their
> EJB2.0 servers?
>  
> Satish
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Solinsky, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:01 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: EJB 2.0 Approved
> 
> 
> THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATED ON THE INTERNET - Please read the detailed
> disclaimer below.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> I haven't seen anything here about this:
>  
> http://www.jcp.org/jsr/results/19-15-1.jsp
> <http://www.jcp.org/jsr/results/19-15-1.jsp> 
>  
> The EJB 2.0 Standard was approved by the Java Community Process on Wednesday
> the 4th. Now that the orion developers can be sure that the standard will
> not change, what sort of timeline can we expect for implementation? The most
> critical component for me is the Local Interface.
>  
> It is interesting that at Java One Larry Ellison bragged about how Oraclew
> ould be the first to implement EJB 2.0 using their brand new platform (Orion
> didn't get any direct mention). If Orion (or Oracle) is truly is to beat
> Weblogic in this race, then there must already be some developed code thath
> asn't been released.
>  
> JWS
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The following message has been automatically added by the mail gateway to
> comply with a Royal & Sun Alliance IT Security requirement:
> 
> As this email arrived via the Internet you should be cautious about its
> origin and content. Replies which contain sensitive information or
> legal/contractual obligations are particularly vulnerable. In these cases
> you should not reply unless you are authorised to do so, and adequate
> encryption is employed.
> 
> If you have any questions, please speak to your local desktop support team
> or IT security contact.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail communication and any attachments are confidential and intended
> only for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
> communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, or
> distribution of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify USPowerSolutions Corporation
> immediately by telephone at (617)547-3800 or via e-mail at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and destroy all copies of this communication and
> any attachments. 
> 
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com

Reply via email to