Huh? There are several constraints to BMP beans which make them almost always perform slower than CMP beans. In particular, the inability to bulk load beans from finder methods is a nearly fatal defect.
In general, I recommend a combination of CMP entities and raw JDBC in session beans for queries that are not efficient or possible in a CMP environment. Just watch out for relationships in Orion. They are horribly broken, have been for years, and don't show any sign of getting better. Jeff Schnitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Chau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 6:11 PM > To: Orion-Interest > Subject: RE: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better? > > If performance is the only factor, BMP performs a million times faster > than CMP. Well, may be not that much faster, but you get the point. > > CMP is for ease of development, basically the container does all the > work for you, but it is not as flexible and you cannot fine tune the > query like you can do in BMP. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orion > Newsgroup > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:40 PM > To: Orion-Interest > Subject: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better? > > Subject: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better? > From: "alt.cybercafes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > === > I am in the process of building a database intensive app and wanted to > know > whether to use container manage persistance versus bean manage > persistence > for this database instensive application. What are the pros and cons of > CMP > and BMP.? > > thanks > > > > >
