From: "Daniel F. Savarese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Therefore, the \p feature has no meaning for regular expressions in Java
> and we don't need to implement it.
BUT Xerces-J (IBM regex4j) was implemented \p feature. So, I implemented it
at ORO.
'\d' is included only '0'-'9' ASCII characters with Xerces-J. But \p is
included all unicode
numerical characters. '\d' in ORO isn't so.
> Could you remove the \p stuff and __parseUtf8Perl() stuff from your
> patch and resubmit it? That is, unless anyone can make a convincing
> case for why \p is necessary in Java. I may be missing something.
I can remove it. I never use \p expression with ORO:)
What do you think about this?
PS:
You can compare other java regular expression libraries here: (use MSIE)
http://www21.freeweb.ne.jp/computer/torakun/java/regex/regex.html
---------------------
Takashi Okamoto
