In message <p05111706b8e61ed9757d@[192.168.9.116]>, "Mark F. Murphy" writes: >At 3:02 PM -0400 4/19/02, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: >>My recommendation is to change Perl5Util.split() to fully conform with >>Perl because that's what it claims to do and Perl5Util is intended to >>match Perl's behavior, however inconsistent it may be. I would also >>recommend leaving Util.split() alone and documenting these added >>differences. Util.split() should be an implementation of how a >>self-consistent split() with no surprises "should be." > >I agree with your recommendation.
OK, the ayes have it :) I'll try to make the necessary changes this coming weekend unless anyone else wants to take it on. daniel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
