Hello, On Nov 24, 2009, at 16:50 , Yiping Cheng wrote:
> Thank you so much for your great help! Your guess is completely correct > and I have > now fixed the problem by adding initialization code in the main program. Thanks for the feedback, glad I could help :-) > Now there is another problem. It has to do with the following statement in > the main program > > [...] Since transportsRegisteredSoFar and availableTransportCount are > forced to be equal > by the first assignment statement. An errorneous result of the above code is > that every loaded > dynamic-linked library will eventually be unloaded. Is it that you discarded > the xpt part of the > SyncML RTK and therefore the xpt part has not been maintained for years? Exactly :-( We have used and improved the XPT part for some of our products, but always with statically linked in transports (http, that is - OBEX only experimentally). In all of our projects using XPT we have the following in a prefix file: // we want the toolkit linked static #define __LINK_TOOLKIT_STATIC__ 1 // we want the XPT linked static #define LINK_TRANSPORT_STATICALLY 1 // - select transports #define INCLUDE_HTTP_STATICALLY //#define INCLUDE_OBEX_STATICALLY //#define INCLUDE_WSP_STATICALLY As said, I've never used WSP and OBEX only experimentally a long time ago. So enabling these might not work out of the box either. Best Regards, Lukas Lukas Zeller (l...@synthesis.ch) - Synthesis AG, SyncML Solutions & Sustainable Software Concepts i...@synthesis.ch, http://www.synthesis.ch _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
