On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 15:26 +0100, Lukas Zeller wrote: > On Apr 7, 2010, at 14:45 , Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > This is related to http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10462 > > > > Regarding solving this problem, the obvious choice would be to make > > X-Synthesis-Ref depend on a specific rule: when encoding for Evolution, > > don't enable the extension. But this is not possible at the moment. > > Why not? Is the enhanced rule mechanism not sufficient yet for this? If not, > what is missing?
I agree, we could duplicate the <property> definition, once with and once without the extension. But these definitions tend to be large, so I would rather like to enable specific <parameter> entries with a rule parameter, which is not possible. I logged some ideas how this could be improved via pre-processing here: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10462#c1 -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
