On Fr, 2011-06-17 at 14:41 +0100, Lukas Zeller wrote:
> See the attached patch for a new script function COMPARISONMODE(), compiles
> but is UNTESTED.
I can confirm that it works. Thanks a lot. I'm going to add it as a
commit to the "master" branch on meego.gitorious.org.
> With this, your comparescript could probably look like:
>
> if (COMPARISONMODE!="age" &&
> TARGET.UID == REFERENCE.UID &&
> TARGET.ORIGSTART == REFERENCE.ORIGSTART) {
> RES = 0;
> } else {
> RES = COMPARE(TARGET.DMODIFIED, REFERENCE.DMODIFIED);
> }
Are you sure that the else clause for UID or RECURRENCE-ID not matching
should be another content comparison? If the comparison mode is not
"age", then I want to rely exclusively on UID/RECURRENCE-ID for
equal/not equal, and thus I have the following logic:
INTEGER RES;
if (COMPARISONMODE() != "age" && SESSIONVAR("VCALENDAR_COMPARE_UID") ) {
if (TARGET.UID == REFERENCE.UID &&
TARGET.ORIGSTART == REFERENCE.ORIGSTART) {
RES = 0;
} else {
RES = -999;
}
} else {
RES = COMPAREFIELDS();
}
The VCALENDAR_COMPARE_UID session variable will be false when I want the
default behavior. Does this look right?
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
_______________________________________________
os-libsynthesis mailing list
os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch
http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
