Hello Patrick, On 31.08.2012, at 15:49, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote:
> [...] let's focus on one-way syncing for PBAP. > >> At the moment, the engine cannot know whether it is meant to mirror the >> data and thus it will leave the extra items on the server unchanged. I >> intend to add a "<mirror>" config option similar to "<readonly>". If >> set, the engine will not only avoid sending changes to the client, it >> will also remove those extra local items. > > I've done it a bit differently: instead of adding a config option, > there's now only a macro call. The full code is in the "pbap" branch. I > also pushed the patches which use this feature into the "pbap" > SyncEvolution branch. > > I'm attaching the libsynthesis patches for review. Lukas, does this make > sense? Yes. I looked through the patches and everything looks ok to me. > Can it get included upstream? Yes. As I thought it was about time to clean up and update master as well, I merged everything into my working branch and rebased it on luz_rebased, as a "release candidate" for updating master real soon now... > If yes, then I would rebase onto your latest code first. I held back > with that because I wanted to release 1.3 with minimal changes. luz_rebased is a candidate for master, you can take that, or create your own rebased version, whatever fits better. Once this has settled, I'll see how to update master. Best Regards, Lukas Zeller, plan44.ch l...@plan44.ch - www.plan44.ch _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
