I think marking them somehow would be worthwhile, but I am not
necessarily saying they are more important than other tasks. If no one
wanted a particular feature, it could be a waste of time to implement it
if there are other tasks that people do want.
-> richard
BJ Hargrave wrote:
The should be clearly marked since spec compliance items must be done,
while the others are optional.
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: +1 407 849 9117 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788
"Richard S. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2005-09-30 10:41:18 AM:
Upayavira wrote:
Actually, it is probably easier than that. Just write a list of things
you'd like to do if you had an infinite amount of time, and add a few
things you think you really _should_ do, if you could only feel
bothered.
Sounds reasonable. I had already put a few things in JIRA previously.
However, this list could get pretty long if I list everything in R4 that
needs to be done.
There are basically two levels of tasks, spec compliance ones and ones
that I would like to do to improve the design. I am not sure if these
two should be differentiated in any way.
-> richard
