Bugs item #835459, was opened at 2003-11-03 20:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tfleury
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=835459&group_id=9368

Category: Installation
Group: 2.4
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
>Assigned to: John (muglerj)
Summary: "missing"/organize install phases

Initial Comment:
With the new Install/Uninstall some of the existing
phases are missed or are not necessarily obvious for
order of execution by a user.

+ The 'setup' scripts seem to be ok, need to be tested.
+ The Configurator phas (pre_configure, post_configure)
is skipped.
+ The post_install can be run by clicking on Step6 but
it's not   necessarily obvious that a user should click
this after doing the In/Un Execute button.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Terry Fleury (tfleury)
Date: 2003-11-13 18:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=116599

I modified the install_uninstall_packages subroutine (in
PackageInUn.pm) to handle all aspects of Updating installed
packages.  This subroutine now pops up the Updater (which is
simply the Selector run in a different mode).  When the
Updater finishes, we check to see if any packages were
selected for installation. If so, we pop up a dialog asking
the user if he wants to run the Configurator.  If so, we pop
up the Configurator.  After that, we do the rest of the
steps necessary for installing/uninstalling the selected
packages.

I am leaving this bug "open" until it can be tested better,
but I think the issue with how/when to run the Configurator
has been resolved.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Date: 2003-11-12 15:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=288102

What's the status of the Configurator aspect?  Does it now
automatically process the Configurator if needed or does it
require the user to manually click it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Date: 2003-11-11 09:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=288102

Can this be closed?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Brechin (brechin)
Date: 2003-11-05 09:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=274641

Actually, all the post_install scripts should be run.  What 
about packages that are checking to see what other 
packages are installed and doing something accordingly?  I 
don't know if this is done by any package right now, but it is 
a reasonable situation that would require all (installed 
packages') post_install scripts to be run.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Date: 2003-11-05 07:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=288102

Cool, and I believe John checked in his update that ran
'post_install' for the given packages so that should take
care of the 3rd item.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Terry Fleury (tfleury)
Date: 2003-11-04 20:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=116599

I fixed the 2nd problem of the Configurator phase.  The
Configurator now looks at selected packages in the current
package set (which it used to do) AND packages which
"should_be_installed" (as set by the Install/Uninstall
Package phase).  This isn't a perfect fix since the user can
configure packages which may have already been installed
(and thus nothing will happen for that package), but it's a
hack which should be good enough for SC'03.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=835459&group_id=9368


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to