Can you at least answer my question: which rpm had the problem?  It
should probably be fixed.

Jason

On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 08:24, Lombard, David N wrote:
> Iâm not quite sure what youâve written, except to rephrase.  But, if
> that helpsâ
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> 
> David N. Lombard
> 
>  
> 
> My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Brechin[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 6:10 PM
> To: Lombard, David N
> Cc: OSCAR development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] Proper use of rpm(1) scriptlets
> 
>  
> 
> I think the most important question to ask now is... which rpm had the
> problem?
> 
> The scriptlet argument chart is not really fully precise.  The most
> important values are (as quoted from
> http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-scripts.html)
> 
> 1.   When the first version of a package is installed, its %pre and
> %post scripts will be passed an argument equal to 1. 
> 
> 2.   When the last version of a package is erased, its %preun and
> %postun scripts will be passed an argument equal to 0.
> 
> >    Install, no version currently installed          1
> >    Upgrade, with later version or forced install
> >     of same version                                >1
> >    Erase of last version currently installed        0
> >  
> >  
> >   
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to