On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Jeremy Enos wrote:
Seriously, I'd vouch for that... Jeff did get the requested changes taken care of. However, I too would vote that any RPM checked into CVS should have an associated SRPM along with it. The confusion here was caused by an error in not keeping them synchronized, not the mere availability of the SRPM, right? I'm 90% confident that Jeff would come through in time w/ any needed changes, but that doesn't seem like enough reason to make exception to the standard practice.
What, only 90%? ;-)
Ok, good enough. I'll make an SRPM and put it in.
But please make all switcher changes through me.
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
