Just so you know, I checked the project out last week (August 17th) and it works fine 
for me:

bash-2.05$ svn log openpbs-oscar-2.3.16-11.i386.rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r1993 | brechin | 2003-07-15 14:20:36 -0700 (Tue, 15 Jul 2003) | 2 lines

New PBS with ia64 patch, and should have good xpbs interpreter

------------------------------------------------------------------------

When I do a rpm -qip on the OpenPBS package I did not get any error message, but 
Benoit and Thomas both encountered the MD5 error listed below.

I am running svn v1.0.6 on a RedHat box.

Cheers,

Bernard 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Jeff Squyres
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 14:51
> To: Benoit des Ligneris
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] svn newbie question :)
> 
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]@#$
> 
> I'll investigate (sorry, just returning to e-mail after being 
> offline most of the week).  This could all be a bug in the 
> svn import script -- I used the latest-n-greatest instead of 
> the one that we have used reliably several times for other projects.
> 
> On Aug 22, 2004, at 12:05 AM, Benoit des Ligneris wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there a problem with others files as well ?
> >
> > Anyway, it looks like I have trouble with most/all of the 
> OSCAR rpms.
> >
> > I have errors like those ones :
> > rpm -Uvh packages/oda/RPMS/oda-1.30-1.noarch.rpm
> > erreur: packages/oda/RPMS/oda-1.30-1.noarch.rpm: Somme MD5: BAD
> > Expected(177d23138dbab9b60b6c90bb829fc1c3) !=
> > (507ef1c3783c7fe83b0d6c8109d51e18)
> > erreur: packages/oda/RPMS/oda-1.30-1.noarch.rpm ne peut être 
> > installé
> >
> > rpm -Uvh
> > share/prereqs/update-rpms/RPMS/update-rpms-1.1.10-16.noarch.rpm
> > erreur:  
> > share/prereqs/update-rpms/RPMS/update-rpms-1.1.10-16.noarch.rpm:
> > Somme MD5: BAD Expected(6e728fa68b2c1c24d5b32289f8c8d4a1) !=
> > (05bfc44a8ad8845a66dc9ab7a52d9d21)
> > erreur: 
> > share/prereqs/update-rpms/RPMS/update-rpms-1.1.10-16.noarch.rpm
> > ne peut être installé
> >
> > (md5sum error, RPM can not be installed, etc.)
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I'm using Fedora Core 2 and RPM 4.3.1
> >
> > OSCAR HEAD from subversion
> >
> > Subversion version : 1.0.6
> >
> > svn proplist packages/oda/RPMS/oda-1.30-1.noarch.rpm
> > Properties on 'packages/oda/RPMS/oda-1.30-1.noarch.rpm':
> >   svn:keywords
> >   svn:eol-style
> >
> > I think that because those are binary files, it should be :
> >   svn:mime-type
> >
> > (at least that's what I have in our subversion repository).
> >
> > Has others experienced those problems as well ?
> >
> > Ben
> > * Jeff Squyres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-08-21 18:45]:
> >> On Aug 19, 2004, at 11:38 PM, Thomas Naughton wrote:
> >>
> >>> After the call on monday I tried to build the 
> 'oscarpkg-howto' so I 
> >>> could post a copy on the web.  I soon realized that the make was 
> >>> tanking and put it aside for lack of time.
> >>>
> >>> Tonight I realized it was b/c the figs/*.png files were in ASCII.
> >>> Instead
> >>> of figuring out how to edit properties, I just copied 
> some files I 
> >>> had from a previous CVS checkout and all built properly.
> >>
> >> As you mentioned below, yes, I did fix this on Monday.
> >>
> >>> Then I did a 'svn ci' (and a 'svn commit').  But I didn't get any 
> >>> output and wasn't prompted to enter a log message.
> >>
> >> If you didn't get prompted for anything, what happened?
> >>
> >>> However when I did a fresh
> >>> checkout to see if things were actually there, the 
> properties had an 
> >>> updated timestamp (Thu, 19 Aug 2004).
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure if I fixed things or if this was Jeff's fix from 
> >>> Monday,
> >>>
> >>> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> -
> >>> --
> >>> -
> >>> r2583 | jsquyres | 2004-08-16 15:26:19 -0400 (Mon, 16 Aug 
> 2004) | 2 
> >>> lines
> >>>
> >>> Previous png files were imported incorrectly (ASCII).  Fixed.
> >>>
> >>> If indeed this was fixed on Monday, what should I have 
> done to bring 
> >>> my previous checkout up to date?  'svn update' didn't 
> seem to work.
> >>
> >> I think that this may actually be a SVN bug -- I meant to send 
> >> something to the list about it (sorry).  I'll explain more 
> below, but 
> >> I found that the following worked:
> >>
> >> cd oscar (your SVN top-level dir)
> >> rm -rf docs
> >> svn up
> >>
> >> That is, remove all the docs and then re-check them out.  More 
> >> specifically, you can be a little more fine-grained about your 
> >> approach (e.g., perhaps just remove the howto directory), but 
> >> removing an entire
> >> *directory* is important here.  Alternatively, you can update the 
> >> directory to a different revision (one that changes all 
> the graphics) 
> >> and then update it to the head again, and it should have the same 
> >> effect.
> >>
> >> What I'm pretty sure is happening is that SVN is *not* 
> re-downloading 
> >> the files in binary mode when the properties are updated.  This is 
> >> because SVN keeps a copy of the file cached/hidden in the .svn 
> >> directory so that you can do things like "svn diff" and 
> "svn revert"
> >> without requiring network access.  So when we updated the 
> properties, 
> >> if you just "rm foo.png; svn up", it'll just copy over the cached 
> >> file
> >> -- which was probably downloaded in ASCII mode.  So you 
> really need 
> >> to
> >> ditch the cached copy and force SVN to re-download in 
> binary mode.   
> >> The
> >> two ways to do this:
> >>
> >> - remove the entire directory where the file was 
> (including its .svn 
> >> meta directory) and force a re-download of everything
> >> - svn up to a different revision that changes the files in 
> question 
> >> (i.e., re-download to the cache) and then svn up to the head again
> >>
> >> I *think* that this is what is happening, but I didn't get 
> a chance 
> >> to test this theory.
> >>
> >>> Also, do
> >>> property edits have associated log msgs?
> >>
> >> Yes, they do.  IIRC, that log message is from my commit of the 
> >> property changes.
> >>
> >> *Hypothetically*, I could have just changed the properties 
> and then 
> >> forced a re-download and all would have been well (i.e., I 
> think that 
> >> SVN always stores things in binary mode, regardless of 
> >> ascii/binary...?).  But I didn't realize this at the time, so I 
> >> didn't test it -- and therefore committed both corrected PNG files 
> >> and new properties.
> >>
> >> I'l try this out in a demo SVN repository (we have one for such 
> >> purposes ;-) ), and see what happens.
> >>
> >> --
> >> {+} Jeff Squyres
> >> {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> {+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank 
> >> Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R 
> for only 
> >> $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and 
> Free Gift.
> >> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Oscar-devel mailing list
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
> >
> > --
> > Benoit des Ligneris Ph. D.
> > President de Revolution Linux     http://www.revolutionlinux.com/
> > OSCAR Chair                    http://oscar.openclustergroup.org/
> > Chef de projet EduLinux                  http://www.edulinux.org/
> >
> 
> -- 
> {+} Jeff Squyres
> {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> {+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
> 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
> Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> _______________________________________________
> Oscar-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to