Hello,
It looks like the LAM RPMs for mandrake are not in sync with the one for
the other distros :
svnu
At revision 2702.
ben lam $ pwd
/home/ben/Revolution/Oscar/packages/lam
ben lam $ ls distro/rh90 distro/mdk90/
distro/mdk90/:
lam-oscar-7.0-2.i586.rpm lam-with-gm-oscar-7.0-2.i586.rpm
libaio-oscar-0.3.93-5.i386.rpm
lam-oscar-module-7.0-2.i586.rpm lam-with-gm-oscar-module-7.0-2.i586.rpm
libaio-oscar-devel-0.3.93-5.i386.rpm
distro/rh90:
lam-oscar-7.0.6-1.i386.rpm
lam-with-gm-oscar-7.0.6-1.i386.rpm
lam-oscar-modulefile-7.0.6-1.i386.rpm
lam-with-gm-oscar-modulefile-7.0.6-1.i386.rpm
lam-switcher-modulefile-7.0.6-1.i386.rpm
Is it possible to update those two ?
Moreover, the config.xml is not valid for Mdk (not the same name and
should include libaio).
I suggest something like :
<rpmlist>
<!-- Distributions that don't provides libaio -->
<filter distribution='mandrake' group='oscar_server'/>
<rpm>libaio-oscar</rpm>
<rpm>libaio-oscar-devel</rpm>
<rpm>lam-oscar</rpm>
<rpm>lam-oscar-modulefile</rpm>
<rpm>lam-switcher-modulefile</rpm>
</rpmlist>
Ben
PS : Was not able to recompile lam-oscar on mdk10 :
libs/liblam.a -lutil
../../share/.libs/liblam.a(lammutex.o)(.text+0xb3): In function `lam_mutex_trylock':
: undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_trylock'
../../share/.libs/liblam.a(lamthreads.o)(.text+0x21): In function `lam_thread_create':
: undefined reference to `pthread_create'
../../share/.libs/liblam.a(lamthreads.o)(.text+0x41): In function `lam_thread_join':
: undefined reference to `pthread_join'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [lamgrow] Erreur 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ben/rpm/BUILD/lam-7.0.6/otb/lamgrow'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ben/rpm/BUILD/lam-7.0.6/otb'
make: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1
erreur: Mauvais status de sortie pour /home/ben/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.39822 (%build)
* Jeff Squyres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-11-02 00:27]:
> 4.0 RM (John) / Group --
>
> I just noticed that due to some well-meaninged intentions, others have
> committed some RPMs in the LAM package (indeed, I even asked for some
> of them!). However, this has unfortunately led to a mish-mash of LAM
> versions in the package.
>
> Would the group mind if I recompile one consistent set of RPMs and
> commit (i.e., a set matching the SRPM)? We're after the RM freeze, so
> I need to ask for permission to do this...
>
> --
> {+} Jeff Squyres
> {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> {+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
> LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Oscar-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
--
Benoit des Ligneris Ph. D.
President de Revolution Linux http://www.revolutionlinux.com/
OSCAR Chair http://oscar.openclustergroup.org/
Chef de projet EduLinux http://www.edulinux.org/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
