Hi Dave:

We have always been using ext2 because there were some performance
issues with ext3 on the cluster - I think we should investigate this
again, possibly do a benchmark to see if this is indeed the case.

I will fix the executable flags in that dir.

Cheers,

Bernard 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Lombard, David N
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:03
> To: OSCAR-devel
> Subject: [Oscar-devel] ext2 v ext3
> 
> In helping a user, I noticed the non-ia64 
> oscarsamples/sample.disk.{ide,scsi} specify ext2 filesystems 
> and not ext3.
> 
> Is there some specific reason for this or is it just oversight?
> 
> BTW, there are some files marked executable there that should 
> clearly not be so.
> 
> --
> David N. Lombard
>  
> My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive 
> Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop 
> reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. 
> Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Oscar-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to