On Feb 22, 2005, at 3:01 PM, John Mugler wrote:
Well, in the future, you will not have to have a script to uninstall something. You can still have a script, if you want one. I'm currently running the script after the rpm's get removed. Not sure if this is the correct order or not.
I'm not following at all.
Are you talking about changing the meaning of the currently-defined scripts? I think that that would be a Bad Idea(tm).
However, I'd be surprised if that's what you mean -- I'm guessing that I'm misunderstanding your meaning here. Can you explain further?
I'm not opposed to having a perl API *in addition to* the existing scripts (where there must be clearly-defined rules about which would get called if both exist). But it is useful to be able to have a script in any language -- not necessarily Perl (Perl isn't everyone's favorite language, you know :-) ). So if there's a technical reason for this, great. But again, if it's just someone's preference, I would argue against it.
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
