> Good point. I had been thinking that linux_distro_ver would be a > numeric value, but there's really no reason that it needs to > be (and in > fact, would probably be a bad idea to assume that it is). So > "redhat" > for 8, 9, el, etc. is probably good.
I like the idea of differentiating red hat linux with red hat enterprise linux and thus the different notation rhl and rhel, but that's just me. And it might be a moot point if we stop supporting rhl9. We probably want to include update version for linux_distro_ver eg. rhel3 has multiple update versions so it would be something like: linux_distro = rhel linux_distro_ver = 3u5 etc. Cheers, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: GoToMeeting - the easiest way to collaborate online with coworkers and clients while avoiding the high cost of travel and communications. There is no equipment to buy and you can meet as often as you want. Try it free.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt02&alloc_id135&op=click _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
