Bugs item #1121809, was opened at 02/13/05 07:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://test.sf.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=1121809&group_id=9368
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Programming environment Group: 4.1 >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Submitted By: Duane Berry (dmberry) Assigned to: David N. Lombard (dnl) Summary: client build fails for non-default kernel Initial Comment: When I tried to build a client from a non-default, non-rpm kernel the client image was incomplete. I haven't had time to test this but I _think_ the problem is in the kernel_picker script. I noticed that the module paths are "lib/modules" rather than "/lib/modules". This is consistent with what's not happening in the client build. Modding kernel_picker to force absolute paths froom root should fix this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 07/12/05 22:21 Message: Logged In: NO This artifact has been closed automatically because no submitter feedback was received within administrator-specified timeout period. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David N. Lombard (dnl) Date: 03/22/05 23:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27334 Deleting packages/kernel_picker/RPMS/kernel_picker-1.4-2.noarch.rpm Adding (bin) packages/kernel_picker/RPMS/kernel_picker-1.4.1-3.noarch.rpm Deleting packages/kernel_picker/SRPMS/kernel_picker-1.4-2.src.rpm Adding (bin) packages/kernel_picker/SRPMS/kernel_picker-1.4.1-3.src.rpm Sending packages/kernel_picker/scripts/post_clients Sending packages/kernel_picker/scripts/post_server_rpm_uninstall Transmitting file data .... Committed revision 3070. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David N. Lombard (dnl) Date: 03/22/05 23:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27334 OK. So it now works correctly, if and only if you have a modular kernel. That's a huge improvement, and probably where I'll have to leave it for 4.1 :-| ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David N. Lombard (dnl) Date: 03/22/05 09:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27334 Found still more errors. INITRD has *never* been supported, hardwired to N. Other errors have not been seen due to lucky use of shorter kernel versions prior to this. Still expecting solution... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John (muglerj) Date: 03/18/05 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=505737 Setting this to 4.1 and a 9 pri. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://test.sf.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=1121809&group_id=9368 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
