On Friday 28 October 2005 19:28, Jeff Squyres wrote: > I think that this was Erich's original intent. > > Erich?
I don't think it makes sense to treat AS/ES/WS differently. WS should be enough for a cluster. The ES/AS add-on packages make no difference for OSCAR. When WS was missing key packages, we added them in OSCAR (mysqld in rhel3-ws). This improved in rhel4. There are no dependencies of OSCAR packages (libs, python, perl, ...) which are different between AS and WS. And, BTW, when you use a clone distro, you usually get AS package sets. Regards, Erich > On Oct 28, 2005, at 1:07 PM, Bernard Li wrote: > > > Hi Jeff: > > > >> I left it that way because this affects all the subdirectories in all > >> the packages (i.e,. changing it means renaming all the > >> subdirectories). > > > > Well, do we really need to treat eg. RHEL AS, ES, WS differently? I > > guess it would be nice for us to differentiate between them, in case > > there are subtle differences (eg. MySQL-server only available on AS). > > However, I guess for generic-setup, we can just use the "rhel" tag > > instead of the full "redhat-el-as" tag - then we don't need to rename > > all the subdirectories (since we treat them all the same now). > > > > What do you think? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bernard ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
