Ok boss.. though i am just a messenger who always get shot.
Terima kasih atas nasihat ini. Saya diam-diamlah sekarang.
On 7/31/12 10:41 AM, Abu Mansur wrote:
Brother Red1, timing is everything. We will not achieve
anything in random rants you know.
Don't spray all your bullets at random (also we need to get invited
again and again so we have more info). I am discussing with Hassan
about some possible agendas using the OSCC that we will discuss in the
group here. Just wanted to get some structure otherwise the con/skype
call will be messy. In Sales we have a saying (you are selling
something), sales is a process, when it is not a process, then it is a
problem. We need to map an action plan with doable milestones. Hope SIG
members can take up components of the tasks ahead so it doesn't end up
on one person, sort of like a gotong royong thing...
Some of my agenda that I have discussed with some of you:-
The Open Development Model in Government Procurement for software ie
projects evolve with OSS license and development process from the very
beginning. When actual tender comes out, marks will be given to based
on Vendors participation for initial phase. Winning vendor becomes
major project sponsor. Recruitment by vendor for developers is also
easier as you can see who are the main developers contributing to the
project. Less possibilities of lemons (Eg Kastam GST like last time)
The other one is software development on top of SELINUX for government
software (I am presenting to govt CIO this coming 10th) to move to more
serious stuff in OSS. If we can tie in with activity one of the above
and incorporate academic faculty members and students in the
development we can kill two, nay even three birds with one stone. The
government can really be a catalyst for our software industry by
providing a fertile ground for some serious software development
through these projects.
More thoughts later (everyone else feel free to rant here) as I am
rushing to send my first draft to MAMPU...
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Redhuan <r...@adempiere.org>
wrote:
I think we should brainstorm more often together (while blasting away
on four pistons) as i do not think our pitch yesterday sinks in or far.
It is better we make a proper presentation as a powerful think tank
collectively, to the right office such as KSU and then PM, and collect
momentos of 'skull tatoos' along the way.
I like to share what a friend working somewhere up in KLCC Towers who
wrote to me a moment ago:
Nor Bahgia B M Nordin:
" I
think
anything
creative futuristic or game changing breakthrough
spearheaded by government servants will fail due to their multiple KPI
mentality, and other restrictions.
Entreprenurs/Technopreneurs/Scientist
have
a
‘no-choice’ ‘do-or-die’ situation, which drives them to do the
impossible. It’s a intense single minded focus.
Jobs,
Gates,
Page
and the rest never wasted their time with the government
types. They just went ahead and did what they were supposed to do
regardless.
I
can
tell you this. The road-maps will just collect dust again."
--
To unsubscribe from and detail about this group http://portal.mosc.my/osdc-my-mailing-list-information
OSDC.my Discussion Group In Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/groups/osdcmalaysia/
Malaysia Open Source Conference 2012
MOSC2012 http://portal.mosc.my/
|
