yeah, I did the que on an interval so I could throttle it for best performance and it works great at 25millisecond intervals.  Like I said, that actually ended up helping the recieving SWF to deal with the mass amounts of logging coming through.  Even if the cap wasn't there for LC, I'd still ahve to do something like this just so the reciever didn't lagggggg

On 8/2/05, David Rorex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/2/05, Tim Walling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've definitely seen lag in some of my lc logging tools. Especially when
> sending messages very frequently, one after another.
>
> Tim
>

I think there might be some kind of limit like 1 LC message per frame
or something. What I did in my own LC - based logging app, was I queue
up the trace messages, and output them once every other frame, and
that removes all noticeable delay.

-David R

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org



--
John Grden - Blitz
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to