Hi, We are looking to clarify our licensing policies and approach to our file formats and protocals including RTMP. I do not have an exact ETA for when we will have that, and I don't want you to assume a particular outcome, but we will aim to address RTMP as well.
-David > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aral Balkan > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 7:27 AM > To: Open Source Flash Mailing List > Subject: [osflash] RTMP specification? Was: Re: AMF > Specification, other protocals, licenses, etc > > Hi David, > > Sorry to resuscitate this old thread but one thing that has > been bugging me is the distinct lack of reference to RTMP. > > I believe that most of the community takes it for granted > that AMF will be opened up. (Macromedia's past stance towards > projects such as AMFPHP have made this quite clear, if only > indirectly.) Regardless of whether or not this is the case, I > believe that the most interesting question at the moment is > what will become of RTMP, which, along with AMF is one of the > core protocols of the Flash Platform. > > Has there been any sort of progress on this? > > David Mendels wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >There have been a lot of threads on this list over the last > few months > >(and longer) asking about our polcies around AMF, relation to third > >party and/or open source AMF implementations, whether we > would publish > >the specification, etc. In December I weighed in on a > thread and said > >"hey, we are working on it." > ><snip> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
