Hello all, Peter... I don't think he meant that your XPath implementation was slow, but in general anything build on top of AS3 will be a little slower than the native instruction set in the Flash Player. The question is how much will that make a difference at runtime for the program in question.
Alias... The nodes that you get back are references not clones. Which means if you modify your e4X result they will update your XML tree. Hope this helps. Cheers, Sam On Nov 18, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Peter Hall wrote: > On Nov 15, 2007 4:29 PM, Rich Shupe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Don't use XPath. You'll lose speed and will have to convert the >> code to AS3. >> > > Have you tried our AS3 XPath library and found it slow? There are > still some optimisations that could be done, but it's fast enough to > handle complex queries on 100kb documents, without you really > noticing. > http://code.google.com/p/xpath-as3/ > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
