Hello :) For me the dump of the SVN is VERY IMPORTANT .... 1121 revisions... lots of sources, examples, documentation, comments in my SVN logs etc. i can't loose my SVN revisions. It's impossible to loose it !
In Google Code i have projects with the same name.. if i want create a dump with the good revisionning etc.. it's really complecated... For me this solution isn't good in the current situation... My opensource work must be respected please ! EKA+ :) 2008/8/9 zwetan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Zárate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > i think it's a good decision if no one has the time to manage new > > projects and stuff. Just wanted to say that Google Code is NOT that > > good in my opinion. > > > > I beg to differ STRONGLY > and before spreading that kind of BS > could you at least list WHY google code hosting is not that good ? > > > I find it extremely slow sometimes and they've been having problems > > with "nice" domains too (http://hippohx.googlecode.com instead of > > http://code.google.com/p/hippohx/). > > > > I don't get your point here ? > you can just access your project with 2 different URL > but where is the problem with that ? > > from http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/WhatsNew > "Easier way to get to project home pages > > Shorter, simpler URLs look better and are easier to remember. When > developers put their heart into a project they want it to make the > best first impression, which is often in the form of a URL in an email > or on another web page. > > We've always valued clean URLs for project home pages, and have used > http://code.google.com/p/PROJECTNAME since we started offering project > hosting. Now, projects can also be reached via an even cleaner URL: > http://PROJECTNAME.googlecode.com. " > > and for the "slow" argument, I think there are better chances > to blame your internet connection than the google servers. > > > While i was setting up one talk about SVN i found out this list of > > companies offering SVN services: > > > > http://www.subversionary.org/hosting/hosting-services > > > > don't tell me you put that URL so people go check there > and click on the ads right ? > > > And i wanted to ask people on the list if they have worked without > > problems with any of these or others, either commercial or not. I'm > > happy to pay a few quid a year for a decent service instead of relying > > on ads and having a poor service. > > > > yes I work mainly with google code hosting and I will never switch > > again if you look here http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/WhatsNew > or simply if you use google code hosting more than 5mn > > you could see (and use) that > "Source Code Review Tools > > Code reviews can be a very effective way to improve your code quality, > and keep your project members involved in the changes that might > affect their work. We now offer a source code review tool that is > integrated with Google Code's project hosting. > > Reviewing code in your project is simple: browse any source file or > diff, double click on a source line to add comments, then publish your > comments along with a general comment and score for the revision. " > > more info here > http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/CodeReviews > > you see this is a feature totally made for people working on open > source project, > no other services offer that kind of feature > > they explain their goals here > http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/MakingHostingBetter > > "Mission Statement > > To support the open source community by providing a scalable, > reliable, and fast collaborative development environment for open > source software, docs, and standards that promotes best practices in > open source software engineering. " > > no come again and tell me that "google code hosting is not that good" again > ? > > If you're really into open source development there is TWO services to use > > 1) google code hosting > http://code.google.com/hosting/ > > 2) ohloh > http://www.ohloh.net/ > > they both have the right spirit about OSS > > zwetan > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org >
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
