I've shuddered to find classes typed: Model, View, Controller in projects I've been assigned to work on. ;)
-Scott On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Robin Debreuil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For a horrifying look at over-pattern-itis, have a look at the eclipse > source code. Not to say patterns aren't useful, but they aren't useful to > the point that they should be treated as some high level language construct > (at least the ones that haven't migrated to become that already : ). Often > something being an 'approved pattern' is treated as sufficient > justification > to use it, which of course is crazy. It is something like saying, 'my code > has no bugs because it has unit tests'. > > Computer Science at any time is 60% fashion -- you have to constantly be on > guard for these things. > > Cheers, > Robin > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of sebastian > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 2:20 PM > To: Open Source Flash Mailing List > Subject: Re: [osflash] Q:Basic AS3 MVC question > > Not sure I understood all that was written below, presumably due to English > not being your first language. > > The advantage of using good design patterns is to ensure future-scalability > and the modularity of your code. > > I often come across code that is half-object orientated; where one class > does two things instead of one, or the code is not properly encapsulated. > > Design patterns, or a micro-architecture such as pureMVC help us to ensure > that our code follows proper separation or encapsulation. > > Naturally an MVC architecture is not required on a simple site, nor is a > micro-architecture on a simple MVC implementation; but applied to the right > scale/type of project, it can make all the [long term] difference. > And a common micro-architecture makes it easy to understand new projects > when old ones follow identical patterns. > > I'm curious as to why you have such strong negative feelings... have you > struggled with projects that are over-structured? > > Kind, > > Sebastian. > > iteratif wrote: > > The whole question is: is what you spent pureMVC because you perfectly > > mastered the MVC model or rather lack of knowledge on the subject. > > > > Because the use of abusive patterns in the frameworks have no meaning, > > it proves the lack of knowledge about the subject. Otherwise the GoF > > would have done it a long time ago. > > > > These frameworks do live that those who create and be a shame not good > > enough for you anlgais in the show technically. > > > > Indeed this is not the patterns or even less frameworks that guide a > > project, these are the needs. So if a project does not recquire model > > MVC not need to implement ... when it was well understood and we > > understand the full meaning of object-oriented programming ... > > > > bonne continuation > > Iteratif > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > -- : : ) Scott Helping your grandma on the interweb at: http://blog.criticalpile.com
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
