As I understand it, MVP is a Microsoft branding of design approaches like pureMVC or Cairngorm. I am not sure how much you can speak in terms of "better" or "worse". -Thomas
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matteo Lanzi Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 8:17 AM To: 'Open Source Flash Mailing List' Subject: [osflash] MVP and pureMVC differences Hi everybody, discussing with a friend we were talking about pureMVC. I'm using pureMVC since the le beginning of the year and he studied something about MVP smalltalk pattern. MVP pattern is used for .net application too, so i decided to discover more about it As every time i have to start with a new thing, I open wikipedia and I read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_View_Presenter <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_View_Presenter> so i thought "ok, Presenter is a new layer between controller and view... so it is the pureMVC mediator"... i think i'm wrong because I'm reading this one http://www.wildcrest.com/Potel/Portfolio/mvp.pdf <http://www.wildcrest.com/Potel/Portfolio/mvp.pdf> and presenter is described as controller so please someone can explain me which are differences between the 2 patterns and why some one think MVP is so better then MVC ? thanks Teo
_______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
