Wow! This is one I didn't see coming! Can you please specify a little bit more the player 9 support? Downloaded the file and the change log doesn't say much more either.
And github sounds better than Sourceforge, yes. How nice! J On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:32 PM, henrik weber <[email protected]> wrote: > thx! :) > would be cool if someone could compile a mac version > too... > > cheers! > henrik > > btw: github sounds good; google code neither. > > Tristan Schmelcher wrote: > > Hello, > > As some of you probably know, Motion-Twin no longer actively maintains > MTASC due to their focus on their new haXe language. But since haXe is > not compatible with AS source code, a lot of people still have a need > for MTASC. Recently I started a new home for MTASC at > https://sourceforge.net/projects/mtasc/ and I have released a new 1.15 > version with two new features that were developed internally at Google > (Flash 9 support and overlength classes support). In the long-term > though I don't see myself continuing to work on MTASC. Ideally I'd > like to see it be taken over by the community. Paul Wise (the > maintainer for the package in Debian Linux) suggested I contact this > list and see if we can figure out what MTASC's future should be. > Another developer recommended moving the new home to github.com, so > that may happen too at some point. In the short-term though, I'd be > more than happy to incorporate any patches or improvements that you've > all hacked together for MTASC into the new version. > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > -- Juan Delgado - Zárate http://zarate.tv http://blog.zarate.tv _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
