okay ! thanks a lot for your explanations !! I'm checking this...

Manu.

2007/12/6, David Callu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> oupss don't finish and google send it, arrrgggg
>
> Take a look to osg/include/osgIntrospection/Reflector. Some template
> reflector is define for std::list, std::vector, ...
> This is the best way a found to generate a reflector for a instantiated
> template not instantiate in the code to reflect.
>
> David
>
> 2007/12/6, David Callu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> >
> > 2007/12/6, Emmanuel Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > What I mean in my ponit 2 is:
> > >
> > > - Suppose I have a library "lib1" where I define my class "Class1"
> > > - Suppose I build a wrapper for this library: "lib1_wrapper"
> > >
> > > Now, I build another library, "lib2" where I define a templated class
> > > "Class2<T>"
> > > In this second library, I define the typedef :
> > > typedef Class2<Class1> MyTypedef;
> > >
> > > - And now I try to build a wrapper for this lib2, "lib2_wrapper".
> > >
> > > As Class1 is not in lib2, I guess the genwrapper will complain about
> > > no reflector being built for Class2< Class1 >,
> >
> >
> >
> > GenWrapper work on one Header at time. So if your  "typedef
> > Class2<Class1> MyTypedef;"
> > is define in the same file of the template definition Class2<T>, It will
> > create the Class2<Class1> reflector.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I also have a similar question on the same issue, more generally
> > > speaking:
> > >
> > > Suppose in my lib1, I define Class1 and the template Class2<T>, but
> > > never instantiating Class4<Class1>... Would there be a way to instanciate
> > > this type with through the wrapper then ?
> >
> >
> > If you think to add  "typedef Class4<Class1> myClass;" in the wrapper
> > source with the optional genWrapper.conf file, this is theoretically
> > possible (from the compiler and linker view). But genWrapper don't support
> > this kind of operation.
> >
> > A solution is to create a template reflector for your template Class2
> > and instanciate this template reflector in the wrapper source.
> > Alre
> >
> >
> > Manu.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2007/12/6, David Callu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > >  Hi Manu
> > > >
> > > > 2007/12/5, Emmanuel Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >:
> > > > >
> > > > > Helle there !!
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm currently testing the osg reflection framework, so I got
> > > > > GenWrapper, an now I'm using it to try to build wrappers for my own
> > > > > libraries... Here is the situation:
> > > > >
> > > > > I've got a file typedefs.h containing something like:
> > > > >
> > > > > #include <osg/Node>
> > > > > #include <osg/ref_ptr>
> > > > >
> > > > > typedef osg::ref_ptr<osg::Node> RefNode;
> > > > >
> > > > > And when I use genwrapper with such a file, just before the output
> > > > > * INFO: creating file `gen/src/osgWrappers/ogl/Typedefs.cpp'
> > > > >
> > > > > I get: * WARNING: could not write a reflector for undefined type
> > > > > `osg::ref_ptr< osg::Node >'
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm quite new to the introspection, so please correct me if I'm
> > > > > wrong:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) Am I right to assume that this warning is not important and
> > > > > everything will be all right as long as I load the osg wrapper 
> > > > > library as
> > > > > this one would provide everything needed to access the reflector for 
> > > > > this
> > > > > type ?
> > > >
> > > > You right
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2) And, if it's really the case, is this assumption dangerous
> > > > > because osg::ref_ptr< osg::Node > is a particularly common type and 
> > > > > the same
> > > > > assumption would not work for something more exotic (like using 
> > > > > osg:ref_ptr<
> > > > > MyObjectType > where MyObjectType is "introspected" in a first library
> > > > > (lib1) and this referenced type defined only in a second library... If
> > > > > someone sees what I mean...) ?
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure to see what you mean.
> > > > can you explain this please
> > > >
> > > >  David
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > osg-users mailing list
> > > > osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
> > > > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > osg-users mailing list
> > > osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
> > > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to