Hi J-S. I'm afraid I don't have any suggestions, it'll require me to spend a couple of hours investigating the issue, time that I don;t have right now as I'm knee deep in tax returns and other pressing work. Hopefully in the later half of next week things should start seeing a little more sanity...
Robert. On Jan 18, 2008 9:16 PM, Jean-Sebastien Guay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello again, > > > local_x = 10 - local_y = 10 > > local_x = 1270 - local_y = 10 > > local_x = 1270 - local_y = 1014 > > local_x = 10 - local_y = 1014 > > > > and indeed, if I run the same example with -2, I get the expected results. > > Trying something else, I modified the osgpick example (which uses a straight > Viewer instead of CompositeViewer) to print the same info when clicking the > mouse. I get, for example: > > local_x = 6.99997 - local_y = 1011 > local_x = 1268 - local_y = 1014 > local_x = 1264 - local_y = 24 > local_x = 17 - local_y = 24 > > What's weird is that both times (osgcompositeviewer and osgpick), the view was > set up with setUpViewAcrossAllScreens(). So it would seem that the behavior of > getCameraContainingPosition() is different whether it's used through a Viewer > or a CompositeViewer. > > I don't know the code itself, but shouldn't the behavior be the same? > > Modified osgpick example attached. > > > J-S > -- > ______________________________________________________ > Jean-Sebastien Guay [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://whitestar02.webhop.org/ > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > > _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
