Hi Manu,
I don't have the head for complex emails or logic right now, so I
won't five into the details of thread. What does jump out from speed
reading this email is why you don't use osgViewer::CompositeViewer
with multipler Views as this would totally clear up an ambiguity about
what camera each intersection test is made against.
Robert.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Emmanuel Roche
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello again...
>
> I did other tests, my idea was:
>
> I have a single main camera displaying a root object [an osg::Group] and
> this root object contains 5 or 6 osg::Camera object as direct children. And
> those "sub cameras" contain pieces of the scene I want to display. Since (I
> don't know why, but) using an IntersectVisitor gives completely incorrect
> result on the main camera in that case, I decided to use my
> intersectionvisitor with each sub camera one by one... in that case
> everything should behave as if each of my sub camera was the root object
> when it's traversed, no ?... but the answer is: NO... :-( this case doesn't
> seem to be the same as using a single camera containing objects as the
> intersection results are still completely false
>
> So my big question is now : what's the difference (from a "camera point of
> view when it comes to intersections") between view->setSceneData(node) and
> camera->addChild(node) ??? I keep investigating... :-) but any shortcut
> would really be appreciated :-).
>
> regards,
> Manu.
>
> PS: here is the main part of the code concerning the previous idea I
> mentioned if someone wants to have a look...
>
> osg::Camera* cam = view->getCamera();
> osg::Matrixd vm;
> osg::Matrixd pm;
> osg::ref_ptr<osg::Viewport> vp;
>
> osgUtil::LineSegmentIntersector::Intersections hits;
>
> vDisplay::DisplayManager::CameraDeq& cams =
> vDisplay::DisplayManager::getRegisteredCameras(view);
> for(vDisplay::DisplayManager::CameraDeq::iterator it = cams.begin(); it
> != cams.end(); ++it) {
>
> osgUtil::LineSegmentIntersector::CoordinateFrame cf =
> osgUtil::Intersector::PROJECTION; //(*it)->getViewport() ?
> osgUtil::Intersector::WINDOW : osgUtil::Intersector::PROJECTION;
> osg::ref_ptr< osgUtil::LineSegmentIntersector > picker = new
> osgUtil::LineSegmentIntersector(cf, x, y);
>
> //osgUtil::IntersectionVisitor iv(picker.get());
> vOGL::ExtendedIntersectionVisitor iv(picker.get());
> iv.setTraversalMask(0xFFFFFFFF);
>
> // Reconfigure the camera:
> vm = (*it)->getViewMatrix(); // these are actually identity
> matrices as only the main camera is manipulated....
> pm = (*it)->getProjectionMatrix();
> vp = (*it)->getViewport();
>
> (*it)->setViewMatrix(cam->getViewMatrix());
> (*it)->setProjectionMatrix(cam->getProjectionMatrix());
> (*it)->setViewport(cam->getViewport());
>
> if ((*it)->getViewport()) iv.pushWindowMatrix( (*it)->getViewport()
> );
> iv.pushProjectionMatrix( new
> osg::RefMatrix((*it)->getProjectionMatrix()) );
> iv.pushViewMatrix( new osg::RefMatrix((*it)->getViewMatrix()) );
> iv.pushModelMatrix( new osg::RefMatrix() );
>
> (*it)->accept(iv);
>
> iv.popModelMatrix();
> iv.popViewMatrix();
> iv.popProjectionMatrix();
> if ((*it)->getViewport()) iv.popWindowMatrix();
>
> (*it)->setViewMatrix(vm);
> (*it)->setProjectionMatrix(pm);
> (*it)->setViewport(vp.get());
>
> if (picker->containsIntersections())
> {
> hits = picker->getIntersections();
> vLog::logInfo("Got %d intersections",hits.size());
> return true;
> }
> }
>
>
>
>
> 2008/9/23 Emmanuel Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I have an interesting issue here:
>>
>> I'm building a scene this way (the following is a lua script using
>> osgIntrospection to manipulate OSG stuff) :
>>
>> local root = osg.Group()
>> root:setName("Universe")
>>
>> -- we want to add this root object as a scene in the current project
>> (otherwise it will never be found)
>> -- this root object will be assigned as the scenedata for the master
>> camera.
>> local proj = vProj.ProjectManager.instance():getCurrent()
>> proj:add_Scene(root)
>>
>> local view = vDisplay.DisplayManager.getViewer():getView(0) -- here,
>> getViewer() returns our osgViewer::CompositeViewer object
>> local manip =
>> reflection.cast(view:getCameraManipulator(),"vGA::ArcBallManipulator")
>>
>> -- now create the LTS project:
>> require('LTS')
>>
>> local cam = view:getCamera() -- this is the "main" camera, the scene data
>> for this camera is the previously declared "root" object
>> local subcam = osg.Camera() -- we create a sub camera than we will add to
>> the main scene (so an inderect child for the main camera...)
>> subcam:setGraphicsContext(cam:getGraphicsContext())
>> subcam:setViewport(cam:getViewport())
>> subcam:setRenderOrder(osg.Camera.RenderOrder.POST_RENDER,3) -- We post
>> render this subcamera with an arbitrary order.
>> subcam:setClearMask(GL.Mode.GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT) -- We want to render
>> Universe scale scenes that's why we introduced this multi pass system.
>> root:addChild(subcam)
>>
>> local st = vOGL.SceneTools;
>> local pat = osg.PositionAttitudeTransform()
>> pat:addChild(LTS.createDoubleCraft("K1")) -- Here we create a satellit
>> object
>> subcam:addChild(pat) -- And we add the object to the sub camera...
>>
>>
>> ... this scene is rendered perfectly... but now I'm trying to "pick" items
>> in the scene using the implementation found in
>> osgViewer::View::computeIntersections(...) : If I put my "K1" object
>> directly "in" the "main" camera everything is perfect, and I can pick
>> intersections correctly. But when using this "subcam" as parent then I get
>> incorrect results :-( (intersections found when clicking on nothing, or no
>> intersections found when cliking on sub parts of the object...)
>>
>> I gave a look at the osgUtil::IntersectionVisitor implementation... and I
>> think everything is happening in this function:
>>
>> void IntersectionVisitor::apply(osg::Camera& camera)
>> {
>> // osg::notify(osg::NOTICE)<<"apply(Camera&)"<<std::endl;
>>
>> // note, commenting out right now because default Camera setup is with
>> the culling active. Should this be changed?
>> // if (!enter(camera)) return;
>>
>> // osg::notify(osg::NOTICE)<<"inside apply(Camera&)"<<std::endl;
>>
>> if (camera.getViewport()) pushWindowMatrix( camera.getViewport() );
>> pushProjectionMatrix( new osg::RefMatrix(camera.getProjectionMatrix())
>> );
>> pushViewMatrix( new osg::RefMatrix(camera.getViewMatrix()) );
>> pushModelMatrix( new osg::RefMatrix() );
>>
>> // now push an new intersector clone transform to the new local
>> coordinates
>> push_clone();
>>
>> traverse(camera);
>>
>> // pop the clone.
>> pop_clone();
>>
>> popModelMatrix();
>> popViewMatrix();
>> popProjectionMatrix();
>> if (camera.getViewport()) popWindowMatrix();
>>
>> // leave();
>> }
>>
>> I created my own "ExtendedIntersectorVisitor" (derived from this class) to
>> override this function and I made multiple tests to handle the "main" camera
>> and the "sub" cameras differently:
>>
>> void ExtendedIntersectionVisitor::apply(osg::Camera & camera) {
>> if(!cameraInitialized) {
>> cameraInitialized = true;
>> // The first time we get a camera object we use it to setup the
>> camera details normaly:
>>
>> if (camera.getViewport()) pushWindowMatrix( camera.getViewport()
>> );
>> pushProjectionMatrix( new
>> osg::RefMatrix(camera.getProjectionMatrix()) );
>> pushViewMatrix( new osg::RefMatrix(camera.getViewMatrix()) );
>> pushModelMatrix( new osg::RefMatrix() );
>>
>> // now push an new intersector clone transform to the new local
>> coordinates
>> push_clone();
>>
>> traverse(camera);
>>
>> // pop the clone.
>> pop_clone();
>>
>> popModelMatrix();
>> popViewMatrix();
>> popProjectionMatrix();
>> if (camera.getViewport()) popWindowMatrix();
>> }
>> else {
>> // here I did multiple tests (one by one):
>>
>> // Test 1: treat the camera as a transform (took implementation
>> from IntersectionVisitor::apply(osg::Transform&) )
>> if (!enter(*(camera.asTransform()))) return;
>>
>> osg::ref_ptr<osg::RefMatrix> matrix = _modelStack.empty() ? new
>> osg::RefMatrix() : new osg::RefMatrix(*_modelStack.back());
>> camera.computeLocalToWorldMatrix(*matrix,this);
>>
>> pushModelMatrix(matrix.get());
>>
>> // now push an new intersector clone transform to the new local
>> coordinates
>> push_clone();
>>
>> traverse(camera);
>>
>> // pop the clone.
>> pop_clone();
>>
>> popModelMatrix();
>>
>> // tidy up an cached cull variables in the current intersector.
>> leave();
>> // End of Test 1
>>
>> // Test 2: treat the camera as a osg::Group only!
>> if (!enter(*(camera.asGroup()))) return;
>>
>> traverse(*(camera.asGroup()));
>>
>> leave();
>> // End of test 2
>>
>> // Test 3: just try not to push the model matrix, view matrix,
>> projection or viewport, one by one:
>>
>> if (camera.getViewport()) pushWindowMatrix( camera.getViewport()
>> );
>> pushProjectionMatrix( new
>> osg::RefMatrix(camera.getProjectionMatrix()) );
>> pushViewMatrix( new osg::RefMatrix(camera.getViewMatrix()) );
>> //pushModelMatrix( new osg::RefMatrix() );
>>
>> // now push an new intersector clone transform to the new local
>> coordinates
>> push_clone();
>>
>> traverse(camera);
>>
>> // pop the clone.
>> pop_clone();
>>
>> //popModelMatrix();
>> popViewMatrix();
>> popProjectionMatrix();
>> if (camera.getViewport()) popWindowMatrix();
>> // End of Test 3
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> .. But none of this tests gave interesting result :-(... I really don't
>> know where this problem may comes from then, and I really need to be able to
>> pick objects in a Camera containing other sub cameras :-S. Do you have any
>> clue about all that ? What am I doing wrong ?
>>
>> regards,
>> Manu.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
