Hi, Jordi. When I've been talking with my fellow team member recently about OGRE to OSG switch he asked me several questions: 1. Raw power. 2. Result beauty. Result beauty (quality of the rendered image) is a group of the following questions: 1. DoF. 2. Shadows. 3. Tesselation. 4. Postprocessing (he said he didn't see any screenshot with that). 5. Material configuration.
So if you want to attract people to OSG, you should give them raw tech renderings which prove that "this uber cool XYZ technique" is easily achieved with OSG. That's more of 'feature' sorting, not application domain sorting. So I would add some Gallery section named "OSG features", "OSG facilities", "Unleash your GPU", "What OSG can do" or smth like that which could contain possibly screenshots from other sections, but with descriptions that tell what's so cool about that specific picture (HDR, DOF, or other modern technique). _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
