-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike Wittman wrote:
> I'm one of the users who is using C# for my main application, and
> performance is a major concern, so the C#-Lua-OSG approach definitely
> won't fly for me.  Because of that, and because of the difficulties I
> experienced manually interoperating between OSG and C#, I'll almost
> certainly be tackling the C++/CLI wrappers regardless of any other
> efforts that are also occurring.
> 
> -Mike

I personally do not really care about C#, however a wrapper of a wrapper
is certainly a rather bad idea and not only for performance reasons
(e.g. loss of type information, loss of some functionality, etc.). It
could work for a hackish and limited prototype, but not really for a
real application which needs a lot of functionality from the underlying
lib and has to be maintainable.

Regards,

Jan


- --

Jan Ciger
GPG public key: http://www.keyserver.net/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFWghIn11XseNj94gRAn3vAJ0QojBU46tiJbXySrFoXeWS2EjVcwCeOJ4t
hiv8TX4naQ71+d8i9XaKyAc=
=/ZtO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@openscenegraph.net
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/

Reply via email to